A Decision Making in Selection of Bricks Using Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

  •   Satish Kumar Jain

Abstract

All building materials such as brick, cement, paint, lime, steel, glass, etc. of various brands with small variation in their specifications and cost are available in the markets of construction. It becomes very difficult for contractors, engineers, and owners to make right choice of materials logically to maintain good quality and minimum cost of the work. Improper choice may result in either bad quality or higher cost. Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods are very helpful in selection of any material. These methods have been used largely in various fields of engineering for deciding best of available options. This paper presents an overview of Simple Additive Weighting Method (SAW), Weighted Product Method (WPM) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) methods which can be simply and successfully used for selection of bricks.


Keywords: Building materials, Decision Making Methods, Brick, Performance Index, SAW, WPM, AHP

References

R. V. Rao, Decision making in the manufacturing environment, Springer-VerlagLondon limited, 2007.

D. H. Jee, and K. J. Kang, A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory. Mater DES: 21(3), pp. 199-206, 2000.

E. E. Karsak, “Distance based fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating flexible manufacturing system alternatives,” International Journal of Production Research, 40, pp. 3167-3181, 2002.

E.E. Karsak, O. Kuzgunkaya, “A fuzzy multiple objective programming approach for the selection of a flexible manufacturing system,” International Journal of Production Economics, 79, pp. 101-111, 2002.

R. V. Rao, and Parnichkun, M., “Flexible manufacturing system selection using a combinatorial mathematics-base decision making method,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol.47, 24, pp. 6981-6998, 2008.

M. Yurdakul, “AHP as a strategic decision making tool to justify machin too selection,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 146, pp. 365-376, 2004.

N. Kulatilaka, “Valuing the flexibility of flexible manufacturing systems,” IEEETrans. Eng. Manage., 35, pp. 250-257, 1988.

J. W. Troxler, “Estimating the cost impact of flexible manufacturing” J. Cost Manage., 4, pp. 26-35, 1990.

M. C. Tseng, “Strategic choice of flexible manufacturing technologies”, International Journal of Production Economics, 91, pp. 223-227, 2004.

H. Chtourou, W. Masmoudi, and A. Maalej, “An expert system for manufacturing systems machine selection,” Expert Systems with Applications, 28, pp. 461-467, 2005.

M. A. Djassemi, “Simulation analysis of factors influencing the flexibility of cellular manufacturing,” International Journal of Production Research, 43, pp. 2101-2111, 2005.

M. Behzadiab, R. B. Kazemzadeh, A. Albadvi, and M. Aghdassi, “PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications,” Europian Journal of Operational Research. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021, pp. 198-215, 2009.

M. Albayrakoglu, “Justification of new manufacturing technology:a strategic approach using the analytical hierarchy approach,” Production and Inventory Management Journal, 37 (1), pp. 71-77, 1996.

O. Bayazit, “Use of AHP in design making for flexible manufacturing systems,” Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 16, (7), pp. 808-819, 2005.

P. C. Fisherburn, Additive utilities with incomplete product set: application to priorities with the analytical hierarchy process, Operations Research Society of America, Baltimore, 1967.

W. Edwards, J. R. Newman, K. Snapper, and D. Seaver, Multiattribute Evaluation, SAGE Publications, Newbury Park, California, 1982.

T. L. Satty, Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with AHP, Pittsburg, PA: RWS Publications, 2000.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
[1]
Jain, S.K. 2020. A Decision Making in Selection of Bricks Using Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research. 5, 12 (Dec. 2020), 121-125. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24018/ejers.2020.5.12.2292.