Examining the use of STEAM Education in Preschool Education

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

  •   Constantina Spyropoulou

  •   Manolis Wallace

  •   Costas Vassilakis

  •   Vassilis Poulopoulos

Abstract

STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts and Mathematics) initiatives are of current interest for both in-school and out-of-school contexts in North America. This is a new concept which is shifting educational paradigms towards art integration in STEM subjects. This article focuses on the need for STEAM education at the early childhood level and investigates the teaching and educational models of STEAM education in the kindergarten and in the first grades of primary school and how pre-school and primary school teachers see these models in the Greek context but also what students eventually learn from these models. The purpose of this chapter is to better understand the educational programs of STEAM education, which are offered by non-profit organizations and both public and private schools. Preschool children have a natural disposition toward science with their sense of curiosity and creativity. More research needs to be done in the area of STEAM implementation in the K-8 classrooms to incorporate engineering education.


Keywords: Early science education, Greek STEAM implementation, K-8 STEAM, STEM/STEAM education, STEAM educational models

References

B. Allina, (2018). The development of STEAM educational policy to promote student creativity and social empowerment. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 77-87.

S. Aronin and K.K. Floyd, (2013). Using an iPad in inclusive preschool classrooms to introduce STEM concepts. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(4), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304500404

A. Bagiati, S. Y. Yoon, D. Evangelou, and I. Ngambeki, (2010). Engineering curricula in early education: Describing the landscape of open resources. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 12(2)

J. W. Bequette and M. B. Bequette, (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 40–47.

I. Brodie and G. Gadanidis, (2014). An audience for math? Ontario Mathematics Gazette, 53(1), September 2014.

R. W. Bybee and B. Fuchs, (2006). Preparing the 21st century workforce: A new reform in science and technology education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 349-352. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20147

B. Clark, & C. Button (2011). Sustainability transdisciplinary education model: Interface of arts, science, and community (STEM). International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(1), 41–54.

T. Colegrove (2017). Editorial board thoughts: Arts into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics-STEAM, creative abrasion, and the opportunity in libraries today. Information Technology and Libraries (Online), 36(1), 4.

Colker, L. J., & Simon, F. (2014). Cooking with STEAM. Teaching Young Children, 8(1), 10-13.

M. Conley, L. Douglass & R. Trinkley (2014). Using inquiry principles of art to explore mathematical practice standards. Middle Grades Research Journal, 9(3), 89-101.

Council of Canadian Academies (2015). Some assembly required: STEM skills and Canada’s economic productivity. Ottawa, ON: The Expert Panel on STEM Skills for the Future, Council of Canadian Academies.

P. J. DiMaggio & H. K. Anheier (1990). The sociology of nonprofit organizations and sectors. Annual Review of Sociology, 137-159.

Elizabeth Buckley School (2018). What is a STEAM school? Retrieved from http://steamschool.ca/about/steam-programs/

M. Fullan (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College.

A. H. Gess (2017). STEAM education: Separating fact from fiction. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 77(3), 39-41.

S. Ghanbari, (2015). Learning across disciplines: A collective case study of two university programs that integrate the arts with STEM. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 16(7), 1-21. Retrieved from http://eprints.cdlib.org/uc/item/9wp9x8sj

A. Harris, & L. R. de Bruin, (2018). Secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEAM education: An international study. Journal of Educational Change, 1-27

Harvard Family Research Project (2008). After School Programs in the 21st century: Their Potential and What It Takes to Achieve It. Retrieved from http://www.hfrp.org/publications- resources/browse-our-publications/after-school-programs-in-the-21st-century-their-potential-and-what-it-takes- to-achieve-it

D. Herro & C. Quigley (2016). STEAM enacted: A case study of a middle school teacher implementing STEAM instructional practices. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 35(4), 319.

D. Ho & M. Lee (2016). Capacity building for school development: Current problems and future challenges. School Leadership & Management, 36(5), 493-507.

J. Hogan and B. Down, (2016). A STEAM school using the Big Picture Education (BPE) design for learning and school–what an innovative STEM education might look like. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education (formerly CAL-laborate International), 23(3), 47-60

D. Huang & R. Dietel (2011). Making Afterschool Programs Better. (CRESST Policy Brief). Los Angeles, CA: University of California.

F. M. Jamil, S. M. Linder and D. A. Stegelin (2018). Early childhood teacher beliefs about STEAM education after a professional development conference. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(4), 409-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0875-5

S. Jeong, & H. Kim (2015). The effect of a climate change monitoring program on students’ knowledge and perceptions of STEAM education in Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1321-1338.

C. Kreber (2009). The modern research university and its disciplines: The interplay between contextual and context transcendent influences on teaching. In C. Kreber (Ed.), The University and Its Disciplines: Teaching and Learning Within and Beyond Disciplinary Boundaries (pp. 19–31). New York, NY and London, UK: Routledge.

M. H. Land (2013). Full STEAM ahead: The benefits of integrating the arts into STEM. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 547-552.

C. Liao, (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44-49.

C. Liao, J. L. Motter & R. M. Patton (2016). Tech-savvy girls: Learning 21st-century skills through STEAM digital artmaking. Art Education, 69(4), 29-35.

M. E. Madden, M. Baxter, H. Beauchamp, K. Bouchard, D. Habermas, M. Huff, B. Ladd, J. Pearon, & G. Plague (2013). Rethinking STEM education: An interdisciplinary STEAM curriculum. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 541-546

S. Moomaw (2012). STEM begins in the early years. School Science & Mathematics, 112(2), 57-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00119.x

S. Moomaw and J. Davis (2010). STEM comes to preschool. Young Children, 65(5), 12-18.

M. Mulcaster (2017). Visible learning: Pedagogical documentation in the Makerspace (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, ON, Canada.

R. Myers-Spencer and J. Huss (2013). Playgrounds for the mind: Children & libraries. The Journal of the Association for Library Service to Children, 11(3), 41-46.

Next Generation Science Standards (2014, April). MS-ETS1 Engineering Design. Retrieved from https://www.nextgenscience.org/

G. Nugent, G. Kunz, L. Rilett and E. Jones (2010). Extending engineering education to K-12. Technology Teacher, 69(7), 14-19.

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2012). Capacity Building Series: Pedagogical Documentation. (Secretariat Special Edition #30). Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/research/CBS_Pedagogical.pdf

Ontario Ministry of Education. (2015). Capacity Building Series: Pedagogical Documentation Revisited. Retrieved from: http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/literacynumeracy/inspire/research/CBS_PedagogicalDocument.pdf

H. J. So, D. Ryoo, H. Park & H. Choi (2018). What constitutes Korean pre-service teachers’ competency in STEAM education: Examining the multi-functional structure. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-15.

P. C. Taylor (2016, August 9). Session N: Why is a STEAM curriculum perspective crucial to the 21st century? 2009 - 2016 ACER Research Conferences. Paper 6.

R. Upitis (2011). Engaging students through the arts. What works? Research Into Practice, (33), 1–4.

G. Yakman, & H. Lee, (2012). Exploring the exemplary STEAM education in the U.S. as a practical education framework for Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(6), 1072-1086.

R. K. Yin, (2004). Case study methods. AERA. Or Yin, R.K. (2009). Chapter 2. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage. Retrieved from http://www.cosmoscorp.com/Docs/AERAdraft.pdf

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
[1]
Spyropoulou, C., Wallace, M., Vassilakis, C. and Poulopoulos, V. 2020. Examining the use of STEAM Education in Preschool Education. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research. CIE (Dec. 2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.24018/ejers.2020.0.CIE.2309.

Most read articles by the same author(s)