Students’ Attitudes towards Discovery Learning / Constructivistic Approach using Computers as Cognitive Tools in Higher Mathematics Education

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

  •   Konstantinos Korres

Abstract

This paper analyses the discovery learning / constuctivistic approach using cognitive tools in higher Mathematics education and focuses on electronic worksheets designed and implemented in Mathematica. The approach was applied at the University of Piraeus. Students from the Department of Statistics and Insurance Sciences participated in the research. The paper focuses on empirical research results on students’ attitudes towards the approach, concerning the cognitive tool used (Mathematica), the approach’s discovery learning and constructivistic characteristics and the development of higher order thinking skills supported by the approach. Regarding factors that could influence students’ attitudes, gender and experience in using computers are investigated. This paper uses quantitative methods in analyzing data collected via the use of a questionnaire and the research approaches used are the descriptive / investigative and the correlational approach.



References

Korres, K. (2007). A Teaching Approach of Science and Mathematics courses using new technologies (in Greek). Doctoral Dissertation. University of Piraeus, Department of Statistics and Insurance Sciences.

Lajoie, S. P., & Derry, S. J. (Eds.). (2013). Computers as cognitive tools. Routledge.

Jonassen, D. (2000). Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking (2nd Edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Brierton, S., Wilson, E., Kistler, M., Flowers, J. & Jones, D. (2016). “A comparison of higher order thinking skills demonstrated in synchronous and asynchronous online college discussion posts”. NACTA Journal, 60 (1), 14.

Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2017). “What affects learner's higher-order thinking in technology-enhanced learning environments? The effects of learner factors”. Computers & Education, 115, 143–152.

Bruner, J. (1960). “On Learning Mathematics”. The Mathematics Teacher, 53, 610–619.

Bruner, J. (1966). Towards a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

Steffe, L., Cobb, P. & Von Glasersfeld, E. (1988). Construction of arithmetical meaning and strategies. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Crawford, K. (1996). "Vygotskian approaches to human development in the information era". Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 43–62.

Knowles, M. (1984). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species (3rd Ed.). Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing.

Learning and Skills Research Center – LSRC (2004). Thinking Skills Framework for post–16 learners: an evaluation. A research report for the Learning and Skills Research Center.

Iowa Department of Education (1989). A guide to developing higher order thinking across the curriculum. Des Moines, Iowa: Iowa Department of Education.

Korres, K., Psycharis, S. & Makri-Botsari, E. (2011). “Scaffolding in Mathematics and Science Higher Education”. Proceedings of the 2011 Open Classroom Conference of the European Distance and E-Learning Network (EDEN). Ellinogermaniki Agogi, Athens, 27–29 October 2011.

Kyriazis, A., Psycharis, S. & Korres, K. (2009). “Discovery Learning and the Computational Experiment in Higher Mathematics and Science Education: A combined approach”. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 4 (4), 25–34.

Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. Routledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
[1]
Korres, K. 2018. Students’ Attitudes towards Discovery Learning / Constructivistic Approach using Computers as Cognitive Tools in Higher Mathematics Education. European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research. CIE (Mar. 2018), 44-49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24018/ejers.2018.0.CIE.643.